Part 11 of 15 in Degrees Don’t Do the Job← Part 10Part 12 →
AI can help mentors organise practical knowledge, prepare exercises and make feedback more specific without replacing professional judgement. This chapter helps mentors and employers use AI for training while keeping assessment, responsibility and correction with people.
- Use approved procedures to draft learning steps, questions and practice exercises, then review and correct the output.
- AI can vary examples, create accessible explanations and suggest practice schedules from non-confidential notes.
- Feedback should describe observable behaviour, its consequence and the next action, not vague labels such as poor attitude.
- Employers should set rules for approved uses, access, retention, confidentiality and information that must never be shared.
- Withdraw incorrect AI exercises, explain corrections and check whether learners absorbed the mistake.
A mentor often knows how to do a job but struggles to explain the small decisions involved. AI can help organise that knowledge. Begin with an approved description of the task and ask the tool to draft learning steps, questions and common beginner errors. The mentor then corrects the draft using actual professional judgement.
For example: “Using only this approved procedure, draft a beginner practice exercise, an observation checklist and five questions that test understanding. Flag anything the procedure does not specify. Do not invent operating limits.” This prompt narrows the task, but does not guarantee that the output will obey it. Review remains essential.
AI can also turn a mentor’s non-confidential notes into a proposed practice schedule. It can vary examples so that apprentices encounter different situations. It can help create accessible explanations. These uses reduce preparation effort while leaving assessment and responsibility with people.
Avoid feeding a tool vague impressions such as “poor attitude” and asking it to rank apprentices. Such labels can encode bias and produce an appearance of precision. Feedback should describe observable behaviour, its consequence and the next action. “Missed two required checks” gives a learner something to improve.
A fictional retail mentor in Ahmedabad wants to improve feedback. Instead of saying that apprentice Dev lacks confidence, she notes that he answers before confirming the customer’s request. She asks AI for three short role-play exercises focused on clarifying questions. She checks them, runs one herself and observes Dev trying the others.
The next review uses the same criterion: did he confirm the request accurately before proposing a response? Improvement is visible and teachable. The tool has supported the mentor’s preparation rather than becoming an unaccountable judge of the apprentice.
Employers should choose tools with attention to approved uses, access controls, retention and confidentiality. Where practical, a shared authorised system and clear instructions are better than leaving every learner to improvise. A simple rule should identify what may be entered, what requires approval and what must never be shared.
Mentors also need a correction process. If an AI exercise contains an error, withdraw it, explain the correction and check whether learners have absorbed the mistake. Quietly editing the document may leave the wrong lesson in place.
Try this: use AI to draft one exercise this week, then record what the mentor changed and why. That review often reveals the expert judgement that the apprentice most needs to learn.
Frequently asked questions
How can mentors use AI without losing professional judgement?
Mentors can use AI to draft exercises, questions, checklists and practice schedules, then review and correct the output using actual professional judgement. Assessment and responsibility remain with people.
What information should mentors avoid entering into AI tools?
Mentors should not enter vague impressions such as poor attitude or confidential information. Employers should define what may be entered, what requires approval and what must never be shared.
How should AI be used to give apprentices better feedback?
Feedback should describe observable behaviour, its consequence and the next action. For example, noting that an apprentice missed two required checks gives the learner something specific to improve.
What should a mentor do if an AI exercise contains an error?
Withdraw the exercise, explain the correction and check whether learners absorbed the mistake. Quietly editing the document may leave the wrong lesson in place.