Part 11 of 24 in School Is Not Education← Part 10Part 12 →
This chapter discusses the limitations of relying heavily on private coaching for educational success. It explores how coaching can either support or hinder self-directed learning.
Quick Summary
-
Coaching helps with exam preparation but can mirror traditional education methods.
-
Private tutoring shows small positive effects on academic achievement.
-
Coaching should not replace the development of self-directed learning skills.
-
AI companions and community microschools offer alternative support methods.
-
Parents should focus on targeted support to foster independence.
When the first ladder is leaning against the wrong wall, buying a taller ladder does not solve the problem.
Coaching exists because it solves a problem parents genuinely have: high-stakes exams are competitive, classrooms are uneven, and families want predictable preparation. Good tutors can be extraordinarily helpful. One-to-one and small-group tutoring have strong evidence when they are targeted, structured and responsive. [8]
So the problem is not tutoring itself.
The problem is the assumption that every educational weakness should be treated with more hours of exam-oriented instruction.
Private coaching often mirrors the system it supplements: lecture, notes, homework, tests, ranking. It may execute these better. It may provide more practice and sharper exam strategy. But if the goal is self-directed learning, adding another institution that tells the child exactly what to study can deepen dependency.
A 2026 meta-analysis published in the NCERT Journal of Indian Education, drawing on seven Indian studies, found a small positive average effect of private tutoring on secondary-school academic achievement. [9] This does not mean coaching “does not work”; effects vary by quality, subject and learner. It does mean that the popular belief in transformative gains from tutoring deserves more scrutiny.
Parents should separate two objectives.
Objective one is performance within a specific examination. Coaching may be an efficient tool for this, especially for exams requiring speed, pattern familiarity and a large volume of deliberate practice.
Objective two is becoming a capable learner. This requires something different: diagnosing your own gaps, planning practice, asking for hints, tolerating confusion, reflecting on errors and transferring knowledge to unfamiliar contexts.
The danger is when objective one consumes the entire childhood.
Imagine a JEE aspirant who attends school, coaching and test series for years. If every day is externally scheduled, the student may become excellent at executing plans designed by adults while having little experience designing a plan himself. This is not inevitable — many coaching students become highly independent — but the risk is real.
An AI companion can be used differently. Instead of another lecture stream, it can become an on-demand coach. The learner asks when stuck. The system diagnoses a prerequisite gap. It gives one hint. The learner tries. It creates another problem. The learner explains the reasoning. The system revisits the concept later.
This turns support from a timetable into a feedback loop.
The community microschool adds what a chatbot cannot: peers who argue, mentors who notice avoidance, projects with consequences, and adults who can see the whole child rather than the prompt in front of them.
The parent’s question should therefore change from “How many hours of coaching does my child need?” to “Where exactly is my child stuck, and what is the least amount of targeted support needed to restore independent progress?”
The best tutor is not the one the child can never live without.
The best tutor is the one who makes herself progressively less necessary.
Parent reflection
• Which coaching hours are genuinely targeted, and which are habit?
• What support could be removed once your child becomes more independent?
Frequently asked questions
What is the main problem with excessive coaching?
Excessive coaching can reinforce dependency on structured learning and hinder the development of self-directed learning skills.
Does private tutoring improve academic performance?
A 2026 meta-analysis found a small positive average effect of private tutoring on secondary-school academic achievement.
How can AI companions be used in education?
AI companions can provide on-demand coaching, diagnose gaps, offer hints, and create a feedback loop for learners.
What should parents consider when choosing coaching for their child?
Parents should consider whether the coaching is targeted and how it supports the child’s independent learning and problem-solving skills.