Were the “Good Old School Days” really that good?

Featured image for: Were the “good old school days” really that good?

This is a slightly uncomfortable conversation.

1 . Parents say : “School days are the best days of your life.”

Many students quietly think: “Are you serious?

Let’s unpack this honestly.

Memory is selective.

Parents remember:

Friends

Playground laughter

Annual day

That one inspiring teacher

They don’t remember:

Boring lectures

Fear of exams

Being scolded

Memorising pages without understanding

Nostalgia edits out discomfort.

But today’s schooling is different in one important way:

The pressure is far more intense.

Earlier:

Fewer competitive exams

Less social media comparison

Less parental micromanagement

Today:

Constant testing

Coaching after school

Performance anxiety

Career obsession starting at age 12

We haven’t just preserved the old system.

We’ve industrialised it.

2. Why do students seem trapped?

Look at a typical urban student’s day:

6:30 am: Wake up

8 am – 2 pm: School

3 pm – 6 pm: Coaching

7 pm – 9 pm: Homework

Weekend: More classes or tests

Where is:

Unstructured play?

Boredom?

Curiosity?

Daydreaming?

These are not luxuries.

They are essential for cognitive development.

Brains grow in free space — not under constant supervision.

3. Why do schools rely so much on lectures?

Because lectures are efficient.

One teacher.Forty students.One syllabus.One speed.

But efficiency is not the same as effectiveness.

Listening passively does not equal learning.

Real learning requires:

Questioning

Experimenting

Discussion

Reflection

Making mistakes

When students only listen, they become spectators.

Education becomes a performance.

4. Why do students go to school if they dislike it?

Let’s be honest.

Most students attend because:

Parents insist

Attendance is mandatory

Exams determine promotion

Society expects it

Very few attend because:

“I can’t wait to learn something new today.”

That should worry us.

When attendance is driven by compulsion rather than curiosity, something is broken.

5. Is discipline the problem?

No.

Children need structure.

But there’s a difference between:

StructureandControl.

Structure supports growth.

Control suppresses autonomy.

When every minute is scheduled and every answer predefined, students stop thinking independently.

They learn compliance.

Not curiosity.

6. What happens when free time disappears?

Free time is not “wasted time.”

It’s when:

  • Imagination develops
  • Social skills grow
  • Risk-taking happens
  • Identity forms

Play teaches:

  • Negotiation
  • Conflict resolution
  • Creativity
  • Emotional regulation

You cannot teach these in a lecture.

Over-scheduling children is like overwatering plants.

It looks caring.

But it suffocates growth.

7. Are coaching classes helping or hurting?

Coaching thrives because:

  • Parents fear competition
  • Schools don’t build confidence
  • Exams reward pattern recognition

But coaching adds:

  • More sitting
  • More passive learning
  • More dependency

It sends a subtle message:

You cannot succeed on your own.”

That is dangerous.

Because the real world does not provide coaching.

It rewards self-learners.

8. What is the psychological impact?

When children have:

  • No autonomy
  • No downtime
  • Constant evaluation

They may develop:

  • Anxiety
  • Burnout
  • Loss of intrinsic motivation
  • Fear of failure

And the saddest outcome?

They stop enjoying learning.

Not because they are lazy.

But because learning has been packaged as pressure.

9. Why do parents defend the system?

Because uncertainty scares adults.

Parents think: “If I relax, my child will fall behind.

So they double down on:

  • Extra classes
  • Extra tests
  • Extra monitoring

It feels responsible.

But sometimes it signals distrust.

Children sense that.

And slowly, they outsource responsibility for learning to adults.

That’s the opposite of independence.

10. What would a healthier model look like?

Let’s imagine something radical.

A school where:

  • Lectures are minimal
  • Projects dominate
  • AI tools support exploration
  • Students pursue passion projects
  • Play is respected
  • Reflection is built into the schedule

Learning becomes active. Not imposed.

Students would:

  • Ask better questions
  • Learn how to learn
  • Collaborate
  • Build portfolios
  • Solve real-world problems

That prepares them for life — not just exams.

11. Should students be given choice?

Yes.

Choice builds ownership.

Ownership builds responsibility.

Responsibility builds maturity.

If students never make decisions about their learning, how will they learn to navigate adult life?

We protect them so much that we prevent growth.

Autonomy is not indulgence.

It is preparation.

12. What can parents do right now?

You don’t need to overthrow the school system tomorrow.

Start small.

Protect daily free time

Reduce unnecessary coaching

Ask “What did you explore?” instead of “How many marks?

Encourage reading beyond the syllabus

Allow boredom

Most importantly:

Trust your child.

Curiosity is natural.

Suppression is learned.

13. What can students do?

Even inside a rigid system, you have choices.

You can:

  • Learn beyond the textbook
  • Use AI to explore deeper
  • Build side projects
  • Read widely
  • Question respectfully
  • Form study circles
  • You may not control school structure.
  • But you control your intellectual attitude.

Don’t become a passive passenger.

Become an active learner.

Final Thought

If school were truly the “best days of life,”students wouldn’t need to be forced to attend.

Education should not feel like captivity.

It should feel like expansion.

Children don’t hate learning.

They hate boredom and pressure.

When we give them autonomy, space, and trust, something beautiful happens.

They stop studying for marks.

And start learning for life.

That is the shift we need.

Not more lectures.

More ownership.

Spread the love